We support the development of international human rights law and standards.

We work for their adoption and implementation at national level.

We promote the independence of the judiciary, and support judges, lawyers, and prosecutors in their roles as human rights defenders.

Updates

News & advocacy

Eswatini: Supreme Court decision upholding repressive security laws is a blow to human rights

Eswatini: Supreme Court decision upholding repressive security laws is a blow to human rights

The International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) is concerned that an ill-considered judgement issued on 13 August 2024 by Eswatini’s Supreme Court will allow for the continued overexpansive use of national security and counterterrorism laws to violate human rights and fundamental freedoms.    Continue Reading Eswatini: Supreme Court decision upholding repressive security laws is a blow to human rights

Egypt: Spate of Free Speech Prosecutions

Egypt: Spate of Free Speech Prosecutions

The Egyptian authorities have in recent weeks arbitrarily detained and referred for prosecution at least four critics of the government on charges stemming solely from their legitimate exercise of freedom of expression, as part of their work, in a fresh assault on...

Most Recent

Publications

Venezuela: the collapse of public education

In a report released today on the right to education in Venezuela, the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) called on Venezuela to take immediate measures to reverse the sharp deterioration of the public education system...

Read more
Unseen and Unheard: Violation of Women’s Rights in Myanmar

Unseen and Unheard: Violation of Women’s Rights in Myanmar

Through the compelling testimonies of over a dozen female ex-prisoners and ex-detainees and their lawyers, ICJ's new briefing paper highlights the conditions of women deprived of liberty, and their intense psychological and physical torment in interrogation and...

Venezuela: the collapse of public education

Venezuela: the collapse of public education

In a report released today on the right to education in Venezuela, the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) called on Venezuela to take immediate measures to reverse the sharp deterioration of the public education system over the past decade. The report, Hidden...

PRESS RELEASE – FACT-FINDING MISSION TO BOLIVIA

Pre-selection process for high judicial authorities and judicial independence March 14, 2024   The International Commission of Jurists (ICJ), the Latin American Federation of Magistrates (FLAM) and the Due Process of Law Foundation (DPLF) led a Fact-Finding...

Tunisia: Authorities must end Attacks on Judges and Prosecutors

Tunisia: Authorities must end Attacks on Judges and Prosecutors

In a briefing paper published today, the ICJ called on the Tunisian authorities to immediately end their attacks on independent judges and prosecutors, drop any criminal charges against them, and reinstate all those arbitrarily dismissed.

التقرير بالغة العربية

On 1 June 2022, President Kais Saied granted himself, via decree, absolute power to fire judges and prosecutors summarily, and [on the same day] promptly dismissed 57 of them. The President had earlier pledged to “cleanse” the judiciary on spurious accusations of widespread political bias and corruption.

The ICJ analysis of the cases of 18 dismissed judges and prosecutors, as well of another judge subjected to disciplinary and criminal proceedings, establishes a pattern of arbitrary disciplinary and criminal processes effectively aimed at purging the judiciary of those who asserted their independence and challenged the dismantling of the institutional independence of the judiciary.

“The ongoing arbitrary criminal prosecutions against independent judges and prosecutors for the legitimate exercise of their professional functions or of their right to freedom of expression is an affront to the rule of law and judicial independence in Tunisia,” said Said Benarbia, ICJ MENA director. “The authorities must immediately end such prosecutions and reinstate all judges and prosecutors who have been dismissed without legitimate grounds or due process”  

In the aftermath of his speech on 25 July 2021 announcing exceptional measures, the President promised to “cleanse” and “purify” the judiciary, which he accused of complicity with political parties in power before July 2021, as well as of inefficiency, corruption and political bias. He also targeted the High Judicial Council and its members, limiting certain of their financial benefits. Since then, the President has followed up on his rhetoric with successive decisions and measures aimed directly at dismantling the judiciary’s institutional independence.

The ICJ’s analysis examines the process of arbitrarily dismissing and prosecuting judges and prosecutors in Tunisia since the adoption of these measures in light of the country’s obligations under international human rights law.

The ICJ’s analysis is primarily based on: (i) a review of 20 criminal cases opened by the authorities against 18 dismissed magistrates and of the case of Anas Hmedi, the President of the Association of Tunisian Magistrates (AMT), which is directly linked to his support of the dismissed judges and proseuctors; (ii) 15 interviews with judges, prosecutors and their lawyers; (iii) an analysis of the First President of the Administrative Court’s decisions to suspend the dismissal of 49 magistrates and to dismiss the request for suspension of seven others; and (iv) an analysis of decisions and reports by the General Inspection Service, the High Judicial Council and the Temporary High Judicial Council.

The ICJ considers that the conduct of the dismissed judges and prosecutors, on the basis of which they have apparently been subject to criminal proceedings, did not amount to recognizably criminal offences under general principles of criminal law and international human rights law and standards.

On the contrary, the ICJ’s analysis of these cases establishes that these judges and prosecutors were arbitrarily dismissed and then subject to criminal proceedings in relation to serious offences solely for three types of conduct, none of which is a legitimate basis for criminal prosecution:

  • for the exercise of their prosecutorial and judicial functions in compliance with the law and ethical standards, and
  • for the exercise of human rights protected by international human rights law, including the rights to freedom of expression and freedom of association
  • for private conduct, unrelated to their performance of their duties, which, in any event, was not criminal in nature.

Contact

Said Benarbia, Director, ICJ Middle East and North Africa Programme, t: +41-22-979-3800; e: said.benarbia(a)icj.org

 Download:

Download ICJ briefing on Attacks on Judges and Prosecutors in Tunisia in English: Here

Download ICJ briefing on Attacks on Judges and Prosecutors in Tunisia in Arabic: Here Continue Reading Tunisia: Authorities must end Attacks on Judges and Prosecutors

Most recent

Events

    Stay Informed

    Sign up for news updates, updates on our latest work and upcoming events.

    This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
    Translate »